Friday, August 20, 2004

BOOK REVIEW: The Spirituality Revolution

BOOK REVIEW

The Spirituality Revolution
David Tacey
Review by David Hay
A couple of years ago I went by plane from Perth in Western Australia to the tiny airport near Ayers Rock (the aboriginal Uluru) in the burning heart of the Northern Territory. The flight path crosses 1,000 miles of one of the most glorious desert landscapes on earth...
http://www.thetablet.co.uk/cgi-bin/book_review.cgi/past-00197
Click on the link above to read the entire review at The Tablet web site.

Thursday, August 12, 2004

Cop of the year enters seminary

book excerpt ||
Cop of the year enters seminary
In an exclusive excerpt from his autobiography, The Gay Face of God, an ex-police officer and current openly gay archbishop recalls his seminary days—and his break with the Roman Catholic Church.
By Archbishop Bruce J. Simpson, Benedictine Order of St. John the Beloved (an Old Catholic order)

An Advocate.com exclusive, posted August 11, 2004

In this excerpt from his autobiography, The Gay Face of God, Bruce Simpson, Advocate contributor and archbishop of the Benedictine Order of St. John the Beloved in the Old Catholic Church, relates his transformation from police officer in Cheverly, Md., to seminary student.

Click here or on the title link above to read the article.

Open Letter to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger

I just received this in an email from Dignity Canada Dignité
the Canadian counterpart of Dignity USA.
info@dignitycanada.org
http://dignitycanada.org


ARCC SPOTLIGHT BY Leonard Swidler Professor of Catholic Thought, Temple University Co-Founder (1980) and President of the Association for the Rights of Catholics in the Church


Open Letter to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger
Dear Joseph,
I am writing this as a man to man letter regarding your latest document concerning women, Mulieris Dignitatem (Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Men and Women).
We have known each other since 1964 when I published an article of yours promoting ecumenical dialogue in the very first issue of the new scholarly journal my wife Arlene and I launched, the Journal of Ecumenical Studies. Further, we were fellow faculty members of the Catholic Theology Faculty of the University of Tübingen in the late 60s, along with our mutual friend and colleague, Hans Küng.
I have to say that you made the most fundamental mistake possible in writing this letter, namely, in you, a male, writing it, telling women what they should and should not be.. One of the first things I learned from Arlene decades ago was that, because the essence of being human is the freedom, and responsibility, of defining oneself, that essence includes women - and paramountly so, because for eons they have suffered the oppression of being defined by men.
You get off on the wrong foot in your very first words. You write: "The Church, expert in humanity,..." And of course, by "The Church," in this instance you mean Joseph Ratzinger. Joseph, if Arlene were not lost in the mists of Alzheimer's for a dozen years, she herself would have told you that you are at most an expert on only half of humanity. Since she and I spent decades sharing each others' writings and thoughts, I will have to say for her what I know she would have added: Given our long history of thousands of years of male domination over women, even that half-expertise is distorted, just as a Master's humanity is distorted because of slavery.
Joseph, you also write that you want your words to be "an impetus for dialogue with all men and women of good will." That is good. If you truly wanted a dialogue, why didn't you invite a group of the outstanding women we have in the Catholic Church to talk with you? In your Holy Office you have a whole staff of theological experts who provide you with the results of their research. As far as I can tell, none of them are women theologians - of which there is no dearth. Already back in 1977 - over a quarter of a century ago! - Arlene and I found a large number of expertly trained Catholic women theologians to contribute to our book Women Priests: Catholic Commentary on the Vatican Declaration. So, Joseph, no excuses about not having anyone to dialogue with before you made the mistake of writing this letter on your own!
Joseph, you made a second major mistake already in your third paragraph. You fault women for seeking power because they have been abused by power. That is a classic move of blaming the victim. Joseph, you are the power! You should not be shaking your finger at women, but should be asking them how you have abused them - and then write in response about how you are going to change and cease oppressing them.
But Joseph, in your section six you really shock me with your misreading of the second chapter of Genesis. It is almost as if you didn't read Hebrew! You write, "God placed in the garden which he was to cultivate, the man, who is still referred to with the generic expression Adam." You know perfectly well that in chapter one the text states that God "took some earth" (Hebrew: adamah), "breathed his spirit into the earth" (adamah) "and created ha adam" ("The Earthling"). In chapter two of Genesis it is not "the man" (I wonder, did you in German write der Mann [the male] or der Mensch [the human being]?), and surely it is not that guy Adam who is spoken of. It is ha adam, The Earthling (ungendered, as the rabbis recognized and discussed at length later) who is lonely, and hence Yahweh created all the animals and brought them to The Earthling. The Earthling (neither a she nor a he) names them one by one, but in the end finds them all a bit of a bore; ha adam is still lonely. Then comes the story, which you know almost all the scholars point out is one of many etiological stories (a story that explains the "origin," "etios" of something) in the Bible - in this case, the origin of male and female. Thereafter it is correct to speak of Adam and of Eve, but not before.
Joseph, here I am still only at the beginning of your letter, and there are many faux pas. But you don't really need to hear from me. You need to hear from women, all kinds of women, but if you are going to talk about theology, which is your job, you need to read and hear widely from the many excellent Catholic women theologians. Then you - with some women writers - might be in a position to write about the relationship between women and men.

Friday, August 06, 2004

"On the Collaboration of Men and Women"

The latest edition of John Allen's NCR web column contains a few links about the latest word from the Vatican on "feminism". It contains links to several commentaries on this document, as well as reference to a piece in the LA Times that Allen wrote on Cardinal Ratzinger.

The big news out of the Vatican last weekend was the release of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith's long-awaited document on feminism, titled "Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Men and Women in the Church and in the World."

My story appeared on the NCR Web site (NCRonline.org) July 31: Vatican document rejects combative feminism, seeks 'active collaboration' for men and women

For readers seeking to grapple with the deeper issues raised by the document, I commend two essays posted to the NCR web site. One, by Benedictine Sr. Joan Chittister, is nuanced but critical (Since when did women become the problem?); the other, by Pia de Solenni, a moral theologian who works as the Director of Life and Women's Issues at the Family Research Council, is more positive (Now the conversation can begin).

I did a bit of broadcast on this story, and here's what general-interest observers seemed to want to know.

o Why now?
As I said on National Public Radio, any other organization on earth would be embarrassed to issue a response to a cultural phenomenon (in this case, "radical feminism") that by now is more than 40 years old. Yet this is the Vatican, where one thinks in centuries. The conviction, for better or worse, is that ideas have a long shelf life, and perhaps bad ideas most of all. The CDF and its theological advisors believe that the toxins let loose by feminism are still at work in the culture, such as growing acceptance of homosexuality. Hence it is a mistake to look for any recent event as a trigger for the document, such as the Massachusetts gay marriage law. It really is what it purports to be, i.e., a meditation on feminism that has been a long time in the works.

o What do they mean by "radical feminism?"
The drafters of the document see feminism in its most radical form, usually associated with North America, as Marxism under another guise. In other words, its aim, as Vatican critics see it, is to promote class struggle between men and women, on the assumption that the emancipation of women necessarily must be achieved at the expense of men. Further, this Marxist-feminism posits that in order for women to gain equality they must deny their differences from men, which leads to suppression of "the feminine genius" and confusion about gender. Whether this understanding corresponds to any actual version of feminism is a matter of debate.

o Were any women involved in drafting the document?
Yes. There is one woman who works full-time in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Belgian theologian Marie Hendrickx, who presented the pope's apostolic exhortation "On the Dignity of Women" to the press in 1988. Hendrickx gained a fleeting fame in January 2001 when she published an article in L'Osservatore Romano criticizing cruelty to animals, citing the modern food industry and bullfighting. Beyond Hendrickx, I'm told by Vatican officials that a number of female Catholic theologians and philosophers were consulted over the course of the roughly seven years of work on the text. Obviously, the choice of which women to consult reflected a sense of the desired conclusion.

o Does this mean Ratzinger is running the church?
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the German theologian who since 1981 has been the pope's doctrinal czar, was already the man many people regard as the Svengali behind the aging John Paul II, and the new document has fueled such speculation. Alas, reality is more prosaic. First, there has been no "coup," and in the big picture sense, John Paul II is still setting the tone. Second, as the pope ages, more and more of his capacity to make decisions at the level of detail is indeed slipping away, but it is not transferred to any single eminence grise. Instead it gets fractured across a number of senior aides, mostly in their areas of competence. Hence Ratzinger is more autonomous to make doctrinal decisions, but so is Cardinal Walter Kasper to make decisions on ecuminism, Archbishop Giovanni Lajolo on foreign policy, and Archbishop Michael Fitzgerald on interreligious dialogue. We're in a moment in which Vatican offices are operating relatively independently, both of one another and of direct papal supervision. Thus Ratzinger is running the CDF, but the Vatican, to say nothing of the Catholic church, is another matter.

* * *

Speaking of Ratzinger, the Los Angeles Times asked me to write an op/ed piece on his impact, using the feminism document as a point of departure. The piece is in the Aug. 6 print issue and available here: The Blunt Hard-Liner at Pope John Paul's Side (You have to register to access the site, but registration is free).


Feminism, Vatican-style

by Tina Beattie, in the August 7 issue of The Tablet
Rome’s new document on men and women shows that feminists and the Church have more in common than perhaps either realises, but Catholic theology has yet to describe the sacramental nature of women.
http://www.thetablet.co.uk/cgi-bin/archive_db.cgi/tablet-00923


This article was featured in a weekly newsletter that I receive from The Tablet. Click on the link above to read the entire article. Click here to subscribe to the newsletter.

Celibacy doesn’t lead to sex abuse


The Roman Catholic Church has done a great deal of soul-searching since the clergy’s sexual abuse crisis hit the front pages of our newspapers in January 2002. To say that this has been a painful time is an understatement.
As a priest, I grieve with the many victims who have suffered because of clerical misconduct. As a priest, I also ask the victims for their forgiveness. The church mishandled the accusations brought to it. Leadership failed when it was most acutely needed.
Priestly celibacy and the church’s view of human sexuality are often cited as the root causes of the sexual abuse crisis. Such opinions are anecdotal at best. There are no data to substantiate any causal connection between celibacy and the sexual abuse of minors. Does marriage prevent the sexual abuse of children? Statistics would show otherwise.
Nonetheless, there is a common feeling that the church’s requirement of celibacy for its priests reflects an outmoded and negative view of human sexuality and even contributes to the sexual abuse of minors.
It may come as a surprise to many, but the church’s teaching on priestly celibacy has less to do with sexuality and more to do with theology. One forgets that Jesus was celibate. He chose celibacy, and he did so in contradiction to the cultural and religious expectations of his day.
Why would he do this? Perhaps it was to illustrate an important element of the kingdom. Love in God’s kingdom would not be exclusive. Rather, it would be inclusive, a love that says all men and women are my brothers and sisters.
The priest lives this same love in service to his people. To do so, he must be mature, sexually integrated and capable of self-sacrifice. While some may imagine seminary training as “isolating and gender-biased,” it is far from that. As a former seminary president, I can assure you that seminarians are fully engaged in the world around them.
And they are no strangers to human sexuality. Classes, seminars, counseling and personal experience make sure that they not only understand human sexuality, but that they appreciate it as well. It is truly a gift from God.
It is inevitable that questions of a married clergy and the ordination of women come up when the sexual abuse crisis is discussed. If one considers all of these issues as reflecting only sexism, patriarchy and control, erroneous conclusions will certainly be drawn. To paint with a broad stroke does not bring clarity. Rather, it covers up the real issues.
A priest lives his sexuality and his celibacy in a largely unsupportive society. He does so as a witness to friendship, commitment, sacrifice and love. Would there be more priests if priests could marry? Perhaps. But it is unlikely that a married clergy would solve the problem of sexual abuse.

The Rev. Patrick Brennan is vicar for clergy of the Roman Catholic Church’s Archdiocese of Portland. He also serves as parish moderator for Portland’s St. Rita Parish. He lives in Northeast Portland.

Church equates sexuality with sin


The Roman Catholic Church’s ongoing struggle with sexual abuse combined with the archbishop’s statements about same-sex marriages — that Catholics who support them should refrain from communion — underscore a significant blind spot in the vocational life of the priesthood: sexuality. When it comes to issues of sexuality, the Catholic Church has lost the moral high ground.
While the church claims it is doing everything it can to address the heinous history of sexual abuse by our clergy, I must respectfully disagree. We appear to be doing everything but dealing with the root cause. We do not appear to be honestly examining and changing the culture from which these men come from. The process of becoming a priest is both isolating and gender-biased, leaving those who follow that path ill-equipped to deal with issues of sexual development and identity.
Since the fifth century, when St. Augustine, classically educated in the Greek traditions of separating the mind from the body, won his personal battles with the married clergy of his day (most notably the married Bishop Julian of Eclanum), sexual intercourse and sexuality have been tied to his theories of original sin.
In other words, the church has historically treated our sexuality as sinful.
I realize that this is a broad stroke of the brush, and in the last five decades the church has done a much better job of embracing our sexuality. Nonetheless, the Catholic Church today remains steeped in institutionalized sexism that impedes the spiritual growth of not just women, gays and lesbians, but all its members.
I attended high school seminary, received a Jesuit undergraduate education, spent two years in the Jesuit Volunteer Corps and participated in youth ministry for more than seven years. Long ago I decided to remain a Catholic despite the institution’s earthly flaws, the enormous good far exceeding the bad. However, raising two daughters in today’s church is often an act of cognitive dissonance. This is particularly true because the leadership of the church (i.e., priests and bishops) is denied to females.
Ironically, at this moment, committed same-sex couples are providing my children with a far greater model of love than the priesthood that I have always valued and continue to respect. Committed gays and lesbians have had to embrace their sexuality in a largely unsupportive society. Their love is tested by fire.
Ultimately, I believe that faith, hope and love will prevail. With the decline of available priests, it appears that the Holy Spirit is starving the church into submission. Eventually women and married priests will be fully accepted into the priesthood. They too will be imperfect, but it will be a good step toward more fully embracing our sexuality as a tremendous gift from God.
Maybe then the Catholic Church and the priesthood can stand on the moral high ground with renewed authority.

Michael Murphy is a social worker and special education teacher with the Gresham-Barlow School District. He attended Boston College and holds a master’s degree from Portland State University. He lives in Northeast Portland.

Thursday, August 05, 2004

The machine ate my vote

by David Batstone
About 30 percent of the electorate - 50 million voters or so - will submit a ballot in the coming November elections using paperless machines. Be worried. The e-voting system in place is dangerously vulnerable to fraud.

In North Carolina's 2002 general election, six touch-screen machines malfunctioned and deleted 436 electronic ballots. In a post-election investigation, the manufacturer determined that the machines erroneously had stopped counting votes even while the polls were still open.

In a January 2004 special election for a House seat in Florida, paperless voting terminals recorded 134 cast ballots as blank. The race ended up being decided by a margin of 12 votes. Left without a printed record, election officials could not recapture how voters intended to choose, and the results stood.

Beyond unresolved technical problems, the people behind the machines do not provide comfort. The two dominant makers of voting machines have tainted themselves with close ties to GOP candidates. For example, last year the CEO of industry-leader Diebold Elections Systems, Walden O'Dell, wrote a donor-ask letter to wealthy Republicans announcing that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president" in 2004. At the time of the letter's delivery, Diebold was making a bid to the state of Ohio to become its supplier of touch-screen machines.

One does not have to be swimming in a sea of conspiracy theories to recognize the danger of voter fraud. Absent a paper record of cast ballots and with software that - according to respected computer scientists - is very hackable, fixing an election might pass without detection.

The e-voting industry considers these critiques as typical anxiety that accompanies technical innovation. Trust us, they say. But their interests, as well as the democratic process, would be better served by coming up with a system of accountability that might actually give us reason to trust the technology.

This past summer The New York Times sent journalists to investigate how the Nevada Gaming Control Board ensures that electronic gambling machines in Las Vegas operate honestly and accurately. Their findings: Protocols put in place on the Las Vegas Strip are much more stringent than those required for e-voting. "Electronic voting, by comparison [to monitoring of gambling machines], is rife with lax procedures, security risks, and conflicts of interest," conclude the editors of the Times.

It's troubling to think that we can walk into a casino with more confidence than we can approach the ballot box.

Excerpted from the September 2004 issue of Sojourners.

Click here to read the entire article.

Reviewer's Choice: The Priestly Sins, by Andrew Greeley

A mini book review from The Dallas Morning News

The Priestly Sins
, by Andrew Greeley

(Forge Books, 304 pages, $24.95)

It's been more than 20 years since The Cardinal Sins sold millions of copies, sharing with readers the sexual exploits of two young Chicago priests in training. Father Greeley, a Catholic priest and sociologist, takes aim at the church's recent sex abuse scandal in this novel.

Father Greeley writes books that make some faithful Catholics cringe. In Priestly Sins, he writes about Herman Hoffman, a young idealistic priest assigned to a parish in fictitious Plains City.

Father Hoffman witnesses a horrendous sexual attack on a young boy by a fellow priest in a parish rectory, then blows the whistle. His life as a priest is shattered by a diocesan hierarchy that is more interested in silencing Father Hoffman than seeking justice and a solution to the problem.

The novel is Father Greeley's indictment not only on sinful priests but on church leaders with mistaken loyalties and a Roman Curia that refuses to provide American dioceses with competent bishops. This novel will titillate, educate and inform many about the Catholic sex abuse scandal from an insider's point of view. Others will be left wondering why Father Greeley must again drag his mother church through the dirt.

Dave Palmer

Vatican Letter Denounces 'Lethal Effects' of Feminism

Document Outlines Formula for Man-Woman Relationships

By Daniel Williams and Alan Cooperman
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, August 1, 2004; Page A16

ROME, July 31 -- The Vatican issued a letter Saturday attacking the "distortions" and "lethal effects" of feminism, which it defined as an effort to erase differences between men and women -- a goal, the statement said, that undermines the "natural two-parent structure" of the family and makes "homosexuality and heterosexuality virtually equivalent."

The sharp critique was contained in a document issued by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, a chief adviser to Pope John Paul II and head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the department in charge of defining Roman Catholic orthodoxy. The 37-page document also outlined the Vatican's formula for relationships between men and women, calling for "active collaboration between the sexes" and rejecting subjugation of women.

The statement was the latest Vatican salvo against trends it regards as undermining its teachings on sexuality and the family. Vatican officials have assailed abortion and contraception; politicians who support abortion through legislation; and legalized same-sex unions. The pope approved the document, titled "Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Men and Women in the Church and the World."

Catholic feminists in the United States said the letter presented a caricature of feminism as antagonistic toward men and trying to deny any difference between the sexes. They said feminism seeks equal rights and respect for both genders. (...)

Elisabeth Schussler Fiorenza, a feminist theologian at Harvard Divinity School, said the document restated positions the Vatican has taken many times and that the only surprise was its timing. She said church leaders may be feeling some urgency to combat same-sex marriage, as well as renewed pressure to consider ordaining women in response to the worldwide scandal over sexual abuse by priests.

"It has some positive things in it, but the political function of the document is the same as the ones before," Fiorenza said. "It's trying to make a theological case, which they're really not able to make, against the full equality of women in the church."

Click here to read the entire article (free registration required).



Confessions of a Married Clergyman

Don't be fooled by the title. In the interests of being somewhat "fair and balanced", we occasionally present the views of more "traditional" Catholics. The author of this piece, which appeared in TCRNews2.com, "Traditional Catholic Reflections and Reports", is Keith Fournier, a married Roman Catholic deacon, human rights lawyer, and author. While I might disagree with some of his "traditional" views, he does have some interesting things to say. Click here to read the entire article.

Book Review: "The Church That Christ Forgot" by Jimmy Breslin

Breslin's Church, Too, Couldn't Shoot Straight

NEW YORK
The New York Times

By R. SCOTT APPLEBY

Published: August 4, 2004

'Do I keep on in a church that I mistrust or remain outside and follow a religion I love?" This piercing refrain haunts Jimmy Breslin's angry meditation on the scandal of priestly sexual abuse of children and teenagers that has shaken the foundations of Roman Catholicism in the United States (and elsewhere). Echoing the anguished cry of countless bred-in-the-bone American Catholics, "The Church That Forgot Christ" devotes four pages to excoriating "the church that I mistrust" for every one that celebrates "the religion I love." The formula produces mixed results.

On the upside Mr. Breslin brings a distinguished history of giving voice to the voiceless. A Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who made his reputation as New York City's relentless exposer of municipal corruption, organized crime, and government policies and actions that discriminate against the poor and racial minorities, he speaks with the authority of a bracingly honest, time-tested public servant.

Mr. Breslin champions the regular guy struggling at the bottom of the social and economic hierarchy: the single mother working two minimum-wage jobs to put her kids through school; the Mexican immigrant denied legal status, health care and a living wage for his back-breaking construction work; the underpaid, overtasked Catholic-school teacher who, from dedication to her indigent students, cheerfully accepts a life of virtual poverty.

In focusing his social crusader's eye on the Catholic scandal, Mr. Breslin reports little of substance that is new. Now well known are the patterns of abuse perpetrated by predator priests, and the stunning complicity of some bishops who covered up these serial crimes and reassigned the priests to parishes filled with unsuspecting children. But few critics have provided such a clear-eyed, unsentimental and unflinching depiction of how lives already made difficult were crushed irreparably by an institution that had seduced them into believing it could do no wrong.

Click here to read the entire review, free registration required.

Wednesday, August 04, 2004

A Bible Pop Quiz

Most of us are aware of the dangers of taking every word of the Bible "literally". This article, recently published in the Holland Sentinel, Holland, Michigan, is a 15 question quiz, with Biblical citations. The author, Rev. Miguel de la Torre, a religion professor who has published several books dealing with issues concerning race, class and gender, concludes with this exhortation:
To worship the Lord your God with all your mind means to wrestle with the text, demanding to see God's face, even if at times, like Jacob, one walks away limping.
I found this article through a posting by Bruce Jarfster on the Dignity Discussion List, a Yahoo group that I've been reading for over a year.

Click on this link to see the article and take the quiz:
http://www.hollandsentinel.com/stories/080304/opi_080304018.shtml